Home screening for STIs
Tom Creer, PhD
March 25, 2010
Discussion (1) Digg This!

Graseck and associates estimated completion rate and acceptability of home screening for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) compared with clinic-based screening in a prospective cohort study. The first 462 women enrolled in the Contraceptive Choice Project were screened at the 12-month follow-up for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae using strand displacement analysis of self-collected vaginal swabs. In a telephone interview, participants were given a choice of no-cost screening with swabs mailed to the participant's home (home-based) or screening that was available at area family planning clinics without an appointment (clinic-based). The clinic-based group also included women who elected to screen with their regular provider according to the clinician's normal practice. The rates of screening, including patient preference and the proportion of completed tests, were analyzed by testing method. Women were more likely to choose to screen for STIs at home than at a clinic or with their own medical provider (75.7% compared with 16.1% compared with 8.2%, P<.001). Women choosing clinic testing were more likely to be African American than those choosing home testing. African-American women constituted 42% of the clinic group compared with 28% of the home group (relative risk [RR] 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.14-2.31). The groups did not differ in other demographic characteristics, STI risk factors, or access to health care. Overall, 228 women (56.6%) completed screening. Women who chose home-based testing were more likely to complete a test compared with all clinic-based testers (64.6% compared with 31.6%, RR 2.04, 95% CI 1.51-2.76).

WHAT THE STUDY COULD MEAN TO YOU AS A HEALTH CARE PROVIDER:
The authors emphasized that women overwhelmingly preferred to screen for STIs at home. Future interventions to increase screening rates in young women should consider alternative screening strategies such as home-based or patient-controlled testing.

WHAT THE STUDY COULD MEAN TO YOU AS A HEALTH CARE CONSUMER:
If this method of monitoring could be included in a self-management package, it behooves investigators to consider this option when designing such intervention programs for consumers at risk for acquiring STIs.

AS Graseck et al. Home screening compared with clinic-based screening for sexually transmitted infections. Obstretrics & Gynecology, 2010;115:745-752.

Save: Add to del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Favorites   Add to Yahoo! My Web   Add to Google Bookmarks     Printer Friendly Print

Comments (1) Free Green tea:

Thanks for letting us know about this. I appreciate your effort a lot.

Posted by Free Green tea | March 30, 2010 4:03 PM Posted on March 30, 2010 16:03 This is the MT Comments footer container.
On This Site
More Articles
Syndication
Subscribe to this site's feed
Search the Site
Journal Articles
Self-management of asthma

A modest proposal: Universal self-management training for all

The Placebo Effect

Prevalence and Cost of Type 2 Diabetes Complications

Polypharmacy

Medication compliance or adherence

The importance of self-efficacy

Approaches to Health Care